Talk:Efke

Forum discussion

Some info taken from this deviantART forum discussion - Photography: efke films. Thanks to FallisPhoto for pointing out that some of the text in the article was an almost exact copy from the EfkeFilm.com page. It looks like User:Brookie was the culprit with this edit. I've removed most of the "Unlike many modern..." sentence to make it less effusive and removed 'easily' from the next sentence about enlargements. Imroy 19:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:KB25.JPG

Image:KB25.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Emulsion

There is said:

"Efke films are coated in one layer, unlike most other films which are coated in multiple layers. This makes the film thinner and the emulsion more easily damaged, especially when still wet after development. A hardening fixer can be used to help protect the emulsion."

That's not the point, they are simply less hardened than Kodak- or Fuji-films for example. As far as I know, efke is not able to harden their films stronger, without losing maximum speed and contrast, furthermore in that case they must be developed longer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.56.162.63 (talk) 21:41, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Efke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130304150012/http://www.frugalphotographer.com:80/cat127.htm to http://www.frugalphotographer.com/cat127.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 21 December 2016 (UTC)