Talk:Effects of advertising on teen body image/Archives/2016

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/par34.htm
    Triggered by \b(easy)?(hairgrowth|bodybuilding(?!-magazin)|weightloss?|mafiawar|sixpackabs)(secret)?\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

reveiw

This article is really well written, and it gets the point across very well. It also lists over 10 sources with actual links to websites which tells me it is pretty reliable. By clicking on the links it takes me to actual pages with also says right off the bat that the information is reliable as well. The main point of the article is stated in the opening of the very first section. This tells me from the start that the article will have some information I may be able to use on the topic i want to know about. The view points are over represented only because there is so much of the same information said in different form, for each section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhurley18 (talkcontribs) 15:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

I really liked how the article portrayed the side of how young teenage men are being affected by the advertisements of an idealized body image as much as young teenage girls are being subjected to it. i also really like how the article addresses the research behind both of these topics. I do not like how the article gets a little off topic by generalizing how advertisements effect people around us because the article is supposed to be specifically targeted toward "teenage" body image. I would suggest adding another element of teenage body image like the specific types of advertisements being presented to the teens, whether it be fashion ads or dieting ads and so forth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.41.197.223 (talk) 21:16, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Effects of advertising on teen body image. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)