Talk:Edwin Montagu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Edwin Samuel Montagu - Punch cartoon - Project Gutenberg etext 16592.png Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Edwin Samuel Montagu - Punch cartoon - Project Gutenberg etext 16592.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Edwin Samuel Montagu - Punch cartoon - Project Gutenberg etext 16592.png)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tons of OR[edit]

The Zionism section contains a mini-essay (starting from the second paragraph) about the British Empire and its relations with Muslims. It may be a good essay or it may not, but it is absolutely OR, with no citations or references.

I am going to delete it. If someone can take it upon himself to rewrite it in a proper encyclopedic style, "ahlan va-sahlan"! Bazuz (talk) 11:30, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo[edit]

Who is the person standing on the right of the photo? Is it Walter Runciman or Reginald McKenna? They were facially similar so I am unwilling to hazard a guess.Paulturtle (talk) 01:43, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Montagu or Montague?[edit]

I am confused. Have searched through numerous books and scholarly articles, and while some (probably most) spell it Montagu, many others still spell it Montague. Is Montagu definitely right and Montague definitely wrong? Thanks for the clarification! 94.34.191.109 (talk) 22:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)R.E.D.[reply]

Hansard spells it "Montagu", which is pretty official. I also looked at several items of official correspondence from the UK archives and saw only "Montagu". ODNB also has "Montagu". So I think our article is correct. Zerotalk 00:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]