Talk:Eastwick (TV series)

The page is written as if it's exclusively an adaptation of the movie not the novel

If you are stating the tv show is based more off the movie adaptation than the original novel than you need citations. Otherwise, be aware that the film itself was based on a novel and you can't make claims something is based off someone's performance without a source.24.190.34.219 (talk) 01:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes, the show is very much more like the novel then the movie ever was. My question is what does it mean that the ratings are listed as 6.09 mil. Its had ratings between 8.53 and 6.36 mil. So where does 6.09 even come from???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.148.192 (talk) 04:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

The opening sequence credits the novel, not the film. Since Wikipedia policy is all about “no original research” and whatnot, IMO that's what this page should stick to. -- Lalo Martins (talk) 08:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

“Powers”

I'm changing the tone of the “power” descriptions a bit. As I see it, it's not that simple; this is not a super-hero show where each character has a set of powers. They're supposed to be witches, and as such they should have a much wider range of abilities they'll develop over time; some will come more naturally and earlier. So IMO we should use terminology like “has displayed” rather than “has”. -- Lalo Martins (talk) 08:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

It is a great change. It makes more sense this way. --Stroppolo (talk) 03:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

i look forward to witches of eastwick every wed. because i go to kemo every monday. and now u take that away. i have a rare blood disorder. and i have to go to kemo to help me. and what do i have to forward to now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.175.215.161 (talk) 02:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

While I am sure everyone is sorry to hear about your condition and treatment, please be aware that the wiki page is not affiliated with the creators/producers of the series, and the discussion page is reserved for comments that improve the quality of the article.24.190.34.219 (talk) 04:38, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Reverend Dunn

He's not a priest as mentioned. He has a wife, and he's a reverend. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.254.196.167 (talk) 04:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Feel free to edit mistakes you see like this yourself.24.190.34.219 (talk) 17:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eastwick (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718204656/http://www.barb.co.uk/whats-new/weekly-top-10 to http://www.barb.co.uk/whats-new/weekly-top-10

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)