Talk:East Hendred

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is scetchy as there is much more information available on East Hendred. this article focuses almost exclusively on the Eyston family rather than the rest of the history of the village, which should be given more attention, such as the other four manors, especially New College Manor and Kings Manor, the land holdings of the three abbeys after 1214, and the Roman, Saxon and Iron Age sites. The Eyston holdings have mostly been purchased from those manors that were failing financially in the twentieth century. Much of this history is well-documented and readily available. It would be nice to have it all in one place here on Wikipedia! Peaky beaky (talk) 11:05, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on East Hendred. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120311062709/http://www.askamum.co.uk/News/Search-Results/Current-news/Best-celebrity-dads-No-7-David-Cameron/ to http://www.askamum.co.uk/News/Search-Results/Current-news/Best-celebrity-dads-No-7-David-Cameron/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"the most well connected village in Britain"[edit]

"It was called "the most well connected village in Britain" because of its connections with the railway station in Didcot and the M4 motorway" - Google shows no results for this other than a handful of non-reliable sources that seem to be quoting the Wiki article as the primary reference. I'd suggest removing this line, which reads like something from an estate agent's blurb, unless a proper source can be added (and indeed, that the reference is even worthy). Grunners (talk) 15:33, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]