Talk:Early Years Foundation Stage

Note about references in "Learning and Development requirements controversy" section

Since this section is about the controversy surrounding the L&D requirements the references are to media reports rather than to the research - such as the Primary Review reports - that these media reports refer to.

--John Stumbles (talk) 00:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

ToDo

Write about exemptions and campaign against EYFS - OpenEYE etc, and impact on Steiner Schools --John Stumbles (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 01:53, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Early Years Foundation Stage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080226125506/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hQ6QhUpdZd4SiSrplf_qjQ693KMg to http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hQ6QhUpdZd4SiSrplf_qjQ693KMg
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080309110624/http://www.tes.co.uk/2571191 to http://www.tes.co.uk/2571191
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070808123457/http://www.dfes.gov.uk/consultations/conResults.cfm?consultationId=1448 to http://www.dfes.gov.uk/consultations/conResults.cfm?consultationId=1448

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Needs full description before discussing controversies

To be balanced, this article needs to discuss the subject matter more fully - at least about the L&D objectives and Welfare objectives - before presenting controversies that are necessarily subsidiary. 112.119.77.63 (talk) 13:15, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

I agree. The article in its current form does not have a Neutral Point of View. Alboran (talk) 04:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

"User:Hornsea88" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect User:Hornsea88 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § User:Hornsea88 until a consensus is reached. Flounder fillet (talk) 15:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)