Talk:EGSY8p7

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Cosmology Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Cosmology task force.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

My contradict-inline template[edit]

List of the most distant astronomical objects says GRB 090423 is more distant than EGS-zs8-1. The GRB 090423 article sounds like its approximate redshift, and thus distance, was known soon after its 2009 discovery, before the discovery of EGS-zs8-1 in 2015. If so, then how could EGS-zs8-1 have been considered the most distant object, when GRB 090423 was known to be further? That is also consistent with the EGS-zs8-1 article which says it was briefly considered "the most distant and the oldest galaxy observed" ("most distant galaxy", not "most distant object"). Art LaPella (talk) 02:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What you say is consistent with the records box underneath the text. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:16, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oops sorry, I must have confused 2 different EGS names. Self-reverting.

Resolved

– Art LaPella (talk) 19:36, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]