Talk:Drying

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Drying article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sanitation Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemical and Bio Engineering (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemical and Bio Engineering, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Chemical and Bio EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringChemical and Bio Engineering articles

Strange structure?[edit]

Is it just me, or is the structure of this page a bit off? The two first headers, for starters, are not in the same style. Also, the first part is too long - it should be a short introduction, immediately followed by the links to other parts of the article, I think. I don't really know how to improve it, but maybe someone has suggestions? (Herrific (talk) 15:58, 17 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I don't see anything fundamentally wrong with the header. You are right that it seems like two different people wrote them, but they are both fairly important. It could perhaps be shortened. Nevertheless, I removed the "copy edit needed" heading. Someone can re-add or change the article if they think otherwise.Editfromwithout (talk) 01:34, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant advertising[edit]

There are two drying methods listed at the end of the article that are blatant adverts for the companies that are marketing them. Either of them are already covered in the more fundamental categories otherwise listed in the article, so I'm deleting them. Thanks. Davidquick 11 (talk) 22:31, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Link to dehydration page?[edit]

I think we should add a link to the dehydration page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dehydration_reaction as the two terms are often used interchangeably. But I am not quite sure where to add it. If nowhere else, then at least under the See Also section (have added that now). EvM-Susana (talk) 17:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Combine Bibliography and References ?[edit]

Can someone combine the Bibliography and References sections? Maybe what is called Bibliography now should rather be called "Further Reading"?EvM-Susana (talk) 17:30, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]