Talk:Dry water

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Creation of "Dry Water"[edit]

G'day everyone, Started the article, and would greatly appreciate any help in improving it over time. Cheers! DeltaFalcon talk / contribs 05:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No papers on it?[edit]

In the references i only see 'news' sources, no papers or technical journals or such. That is a bad thing. Liverpool university and/or Hull university might be places to look. this may be a paper, seen Bernie Binks quoted, maybe some of those papers are about dry water.(but under different name.) (Can't access some of the papers i tried without paying..)82.169.255.79 (talk) 20:10, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ice Nine[edit]

The link Ice Nine in the "See Also" section links to a fictional substance. I suspect the link was actually meant to go to the real-existing Ice IX. If so, it should be changed. If it indeed is intended to go to the fictional substance, I think the link should be annotated accordingly. --132.199.99.50 (talk) 11:03, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sand Size[edit]

It says that dry water is the size of a grain of sand, but sand grain size varies. I get that it means small but, is the size of a sand grain a valid comparison? Perhaps if it said an actual size also I would be happy. NanoTechAdvancement (talk) 19:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Density?[edit]

What is the effective water density once a sample has been converted to this dry form?

  just water -> 100%
  water mixed with silica -> ? %
  water after conversion/wrapping with silica -> ? %

--Hooperbloob (talk) 20:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dry water. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Patent[edit]

US3393155A

https://patents.google.com/patent/US3393155A/en

The existing sources are mostly missing or not scientific at all. The idea that it was 'snatched up' by the cosmetic industry and the lost until being recently rediscovered seems to be invented in 2010 by sciencedaily to sexy up their article.

Suppafly (talk) 20:16, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Vacuous water" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Vacuous water and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 28#Vacuous water until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 15:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]