Talk:Droitwich Spa Lido

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Worcestershire Low‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This isn't really in a formal tone, when I started reading it in my head, it sounded like an advertisement.

Improvements[edit]

This certainly reads with a very informal tone, like a letter to a friend. Almost certainly created in good faith, it nevertheless needs a clean up, some references, and some photos.--Kudpung (talk) 16:03, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tried my hand at a bit of cleaning-up, no harm intended, just aiming towards more of an encyclopedic tone.

One sentence still bothers me:

"the water still contains the salt for that is the reason for the existence of Droitwich Spa itself"

Instead I would like to read something like: "Of course the newly reopened Lido still uses the water from the natural sources which made Droitwich Spa famous". But I can't put it in there in good faith because I haven't checked whether this is correct. --BjKa (talk) 12:02, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Droitwich Spa Lido. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050425074342/http://www.savedroitwichlido.org:80/ to http://www.savedroitwichlido.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]