Talk:Dominant narrative

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I would begin your article with a clear definition of dominant narratives before addressing feminist interventions in challenging these narratives. It might be useful to contrast dominant narratives with counter-narratives, which some feminists have used to combat the former. In addition, I would recommend that you provide a few examples of dominant narratives in order to illustrate how these narratives exclude, for instance, women of color, poor women, queer women, and so on. Lastly, it might be helpful to consult a few scholarly sources on intersectional feminist praxes in order to demonstrate how dominant narratives often omit intersectional analyses of the social conditions of women of color, poor women, queer women, trans women, and so on. To locate these kinds of sources, perhaps you could refer to the bibliography used in the Wikipedia entry for intersectionality.

Smolfeministpup (talk) 20:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for Further Improvement[edit]

I think that your lead section could still improve in terms of providing a clear, coherent definition of dominant narrative. What you could emphasize more in your first paragraph, for instance, is how dominant narratives are often circulated as mainstream, thereby rendering alternative narratives secondary or marginal to these dominant narratives. In addition, I think that you could contribute an additional sentence or two that describes what the term "dominant culture" means and how this term can help clarify what a dominant narrative is. Lastly, I would add a few more sentences in the last paragraph of your lead section that stresses how counter-narratives are often used to resist or subvert the social realities constructed by dominant narratives.

Smolfeministpup (talk) 20:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dominant narrative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]