Talk:Doctor Who Appreciation Society

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've started an attempt at expanding this article. I have a full run of Celestial Toyroom from the middle of 1980, and a scattering of DWAS publications from before that date, as source material. I also have (but not at present with me) the history the society published in 1996, which I will cite when I have it to hand. Matthew Kilburn 17:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a few more additions taking events as far as 1980. Matthew Kilburn 11:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The last two anonymous edits were by me - the next step will be an account of the ongoing controversy regarding CT's news coverage, the appearance of DWB, and the boom in the society's membership following its 1984 advert in DWM; then the Panopticon 1985 overspend, the debts incurred, the increase in commercial activity without registering with HM Customs and Excise, and the 1988 spending cuts. --Matthew Kilburn 17:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say keep up the good work. I was a member of the society between 1989 and around 2003/4. I have all the issues of CT from the period and could provide some help if you like, but you seem to be doing a sterling job as is. Valiant Son 04:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello - did you add the capitalized references to Mark Sinclair and Gordon Blows? I've been trying to stop the article becoming a list of credits. I've been a member since 1983 and it's a challenge to keep the article POV, as we say around here... --Matthew Kilburn 19:10, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Sorry, not been back for ages. I made no changes to the content of the page. Valiant Son 00:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly neutral.[edit]

"DWAS is by no means the only vehicle for organised Doctor Who fandom but it remains the most enduring, in what can sometimes be an unpleasant world. There seem to be a number of detractors who wish the Society and its members ill, and will often vent their views via online forums, despite not being members and presumably being unaware of what the Society offers. DWAS however retains a strong membership base and looks well set to continue into the foreseeable future."

Seems far too biased to me.

Doctor Sinister (talk) 18:20, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doctor Who Appreciation Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Doctor_Who_Appreciation_Society&oldid=1201583359"