Talk:Diversion program

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Biography???[edit]

Someone just considered this silly article a biography. I initially created this stub (hoping someone would expand it some day) with the intention that it be about a concept. It is not about any particular person. Hellno2 20:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changed it --PsychStudentWill (talk) 21:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of Changes[edit]

I'm very dissapointed with this article, as this is a field that I work in I would like to try and improve this article. Any help would be appreciated! --PsychStudentWill (talk) 21:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is important to realize that Wikipedia is not finished, and many, in fact most article could use a lot of improvement. It would be great if you could improve this one. I originally created it only because there was a red link in another article I had worked on a lot, and I felt readers of that article should know what this was. Hellno2 (talk) 22:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, any idea on how to change the title, I would like to capitalize the P in Program..--PsychStudentWill (talk) 02:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move?[edit]

Diversion programDiversion Program

  • Diversion programDiversion Program — Capitalize P in program — --PsychStudentWill (talk) 02:29, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Diversion program" looks like a generic noun here to me. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. It's not a proper noun. Our convention is not to capitalize article titles unless they are always capitalized in running text. This one is "diversion program", not "Diversion Program". Jafeluv (talk) 07:21, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose unless any evidence can be provided that this is a proper noun. --DAJF (talk) 08:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Nevermind, I checked that convention page, sorry for wasting everyone's time, still learning here! From --PsychStudentWill (talk) 18:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • No harm done! That's why we're encouraged to be bold: So that people can learn by doing, instead of expecting that everyone read the hundreds of pages of guidelines before starting to edit. I've taken the liberty to remove the move tag. Welcome to Wikipedia. Jafeluv (talk) 19:11, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diversion program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]