Talk:Dicebreaker

This redirect is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles

Internet

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles

Create this page?[edit]

Should we look to create a page for this site? There's been a fair amount of discussion about them on Wikipedia and they've have been citied 100s of times around Wikipedia including on the LOTR One Ring, Games Workshop and D&D pages. Wll (talk) 11:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you didn't get a reply before creating this article. This article's sources rely too heavily on Gamer Network sources and most sections like Dicebreaker+, Content and Team are un-encyclopedic. Virtually everything noteworthy was already covered on the Gamer Network article, which this redirected to. (Assuming good faith, however your contribution history poses the question if you have a connection to Gamer Network. I would advise using Wikipedia:Drafts when creating articles.) IgelRM (talk) 16:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry, I've never created a page before, here's a draft User:Wll/sandbox/Dicebreaker Wll (talk) 17:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant next time as this article is already created (in main space). As is, it likely fails Wikipedia:Notability (web) IgelRM (talk) 18:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wll: submitting a draft article to Wikipedia:Articles for creation is a great resource if you're unsure about an article. The review process will either move the article into mainspace or highlight the issues an article has that should be resolved before it is moved into mainspace. I agree with IgelRM that this article has a notability issue. Sariel Xilo (talk) 17:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]