Talk:Depends What You Mean by Extremist

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Australia: Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Depends What You Mean by Extremist is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

See also[edit]

(making a new section to avoid edit warring)

Hi @Grayfell: You commented: "The obvious, and false, implication with this link is that Islam is extremist. Better no link than garbage like that." Such an implication may be 'obvious' to you, but not to anyone else. The reason I gave for including it was a valid one, and your personal reaction, I'm sorry to say, does not negate it. And you've once again failed to account for why you removed the link to Anarchism in Australia. Cheers. --Ya hemos pasao (talk) 08:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no obvious connection between Islam in Australia and Extremism which isn't charged and inflammatory. See also sections do not provide any room for context, so this is not an appropriate place to 'hitn at' charged topics. It doesn't have to be "obvious" to you, it is ambiguous enough to be totally inappropriate. Grayfell (talk) 08:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Those are some interesting buzzwords but, again, your subjective POV of how it might be perceived is not a good enough reason not to include a pertinent link. And this is the third time you've failed to account for why you removed the Anarchism link. --Ya hemos pasao (talk) 09:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]