Talk:David and the Phoenix

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Novels: Fantasy Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.
	This article has an infobox template in need of a 1st Edition Cover!

Fair use rationale for Image:EdwardOrmondroyd DavidAndThePhoenix.jpg[edit]

Image:EdwardOrmondroyd DavidAndThePhoenix.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:EdwardOrmondroyd DavidAndThePhoenix.jpg[edit]

Image:EdwardOrmondroyd DavidAndThePhoenix.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DatP on the Web[edit]

Project Gutenberg has a version of this book that's in the public domain.

http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/27922

This includes a scan of the dust jacket that's in the public domain also.

Librivox also has a public domain audio version of this book.

http://librivox.org/david-and-the-phoenix-by-edward-ormondroyd/

Gweeks (talk) 01:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Gweeks. I've added the link to the Gutenberg book, and I might stick the Librivox link in too.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

General Books edition[edit]

This section now concerns use of ISBN 1-153-80845-5 by General Books, LLC, or anyone else. -P64 2015-12-06'

General Books LLC edition [1] needs coverage. Apparently it's the one whose ISBN i added to the 1957 bullet listing. Note the blurb mentions "no illustrations" and "General Books Club". "Paperback Textbook" is a technical term for the binding, I infer; not a textbook edition. --P64 (talk) 03:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But I find by google search for same (ISBN 1-153-80845-5) also an edition that Amazon attributes "RareBooksClub.com (23 Aug. 2012)" [2].

The same ISBN-10 is provided by Kirkus Reviews provides at the foot of its online review (our ref name=kirkus) along with book publ date Oct 1, 1957, and publisher Follett's. The review may not be contemporary (lack of a semimonthly Kirkus publication date) or Kirkus may provide ISBN of some edition that is in print at the time of digitization.

--P64 (talk) 21:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]