This article was nominated for deletion on 9 November 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
The removed part is about him and about his scholarship so its relevant here and it maybe relevant in his book too --Shrike (talk) 17:55, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just to remind people, the removed part is Nick Cohen has written of Rich's scholarship, "If Rich has a fault, it is that as a rational historian, he cannot speculate on the psychological appeal of left antisemitism" Cohen wrote this in a review of Rich's book. Rich has only written one book and Cohen does not refer to any other writings. Cohen is clearly using a characteristic of Rich inferred from the content of the book to discuss the content of the book. Cohen is not seriously discussing Rich. Jontel (talk) 20:33, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
