Talk:Datt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Datt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Datt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 July 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) IffyChat -- 17:57, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



DattDutta – Datt is also spelled as "Dutta" and there already exists an article Dutta which is a more detailed and properly sourced one. So, I request this article to be moved to Dutta. Yoonadue (talk) 17:39, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • oppose A move means that this article would be named Dutta instead of Datt which doesn’t make sense considering the nominator suggested the article currently titled Dutta is three better sourced article and this move would affect that. If I am understanding this correctly the nominator would be better off trying to either redirect this article to the Dutta article or asking for s merge if there is relevant info on this page not currently on the Dutta article.--64.229.166.98 (talk) 06:15, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per anon above. This is not how page moving works; merging Datt into Dutta would be a far better option in this case. Geolodus (talk) 06:57, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: @ Geolodus, I completely agree with you. Datt should be merged to Dutta. -Yoonadue (talk) 01:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoonadue: Then I recommend that you just withdraw this discussion and start a merge discussion in its place (via Wikipedia:Proposed mergers). Geolodus (talk) 08:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.