Talk:Daniel Lloyd (cyclist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

English V United Kingdom V Great Britain[edit]

This states that Daniel Lloyd is an english cyclist but is english the right nationality? i mean in that england doesn't compete in cyclign (apart from the commonwealth games). it is great britain that competes in cycling si in theory he should a british cyclist and not an english cyclist. this is also applicqable to other british riders like geraint thomas and dan fleeman Phil Nolte (talk) 13:31, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think English is fine. Assuming he comes from England, British and English are both accurate and easy to understand, but English is more specific. He's a cyclist who is English. It doesn't matter in this context who or what he has represented when competing. sorsoup (talk) 21:26, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's April Fools' Day![edit]

Returning pro on 1st of april? Sure? Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wv5F5N6mFf0 --RikVII (talk) 16:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC) http://africasteam.com/2016/04/01/team-dimension-data-for-qhubeka-welcomes-dan-lloyd/[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Daniel Lloyd (cyclist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]