Talk:Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment[edit]

The text written about licensing fees doesn't appear very professional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.251.192.3 (talk) 02:52, November 24, 2007‎

Beast of Bodmin Moor[edit]

Worth mentioning the theory that the Act resulted in said large wild cat population (and possibly others) due to animals set free after the act was passed, and their descendants.Romomusicfan (talk) 10:49, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Camels[edit]

Why are both dromedary and domestic Bactrian camels featured in the list? the legislation is meant to focus on wild animals rather than domestic animals. Dennis the mennis (talk) 18:24, August 20, 2021 (UTC)

Because that's what it says in the legislation. If you're not happy with it, write to your MP. There's nothing Wikipedia can do to change it.Romomusicfan (talk) 11:12, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get the chance to write to my MP. Dennis the mennis (talk) 09:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gyt[edit]

Ttt 2A02:C7C:8922:F300:5D52:BBE6:2BEB:E6EB (talk) 15:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]