This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
Damir Kaletović is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
This article is horrible and is based on lies. This once again proves that Wikipedia cannot be used as a reference at all! Mujanovic (talk) 21:09, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This article is loaded with ethno-nationalist libel and has absolutely no basis in truth or reality. To use Wikipedia to attempt to undermine the only true investigative journalist in Bosnia-Herzegovina in turn undermines the entire idea of Wikipedia. This article should be removed immediately. It does not reflect the normal standards of a Wikipedia submission and should have been flagged by editors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.78.229.117 (talk) 18:56, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
