Talk:Daisy Lowe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stop deleting[edit]

Can people here please give good infor on why you keep deleting perfectly good information on from here please instead of just doin it this is what this discussion page is for. i would like to point out this page was made AFTER!!!!!! Daisy started dating Mark Ronson also she wasn't in any magazine or a celeb at all so like it or not the reason shes everywhere now and is considered a celebrity is coz of her relationship with him if that can't be noted here then this article of hers should be taken down as it WOULD NOT have been put up here otherwise it vanderlism i used perfectly well sources links to go with it so there should be nothing wrong it give a good reason and give me sources that proves Daisy was famous and in all the celeb mags and papers and well known to the public b4 she dated him then i'll agree to not put it up there but untill you prove that, it needs to stay up there simple as if you don't like it then we should delete this whole thing82.22.206.205 (talk) 18:33, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It has been explained that you need a reliable source which states that claim. Besides which, the comment goes against WP:BLP policy because it is unsourced defamatory commentary. Do not re-add the information without a source. Seraphim♥Whipp 09:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

if you ACTUALLY read it you would've seen that i used london times and mtv and lots of other very well sources that proves the information i wasn't the only one that posted it up here i saw it up here done buy others b4 which i deleted as i wasn't sourced or written well you clearly don't know wikipedia well if you look at other article there the worse like Peaches Geldolf Paris Hilton there lots of them give me a gr8 good reason that proves this would still have been up here cause it wouldn't as it was done AFTER thats AFTER she dated him and she started to get publicity for it if you don't like FACTS or other well known to the public information then GET OF WIKIPEDIA as this is what wikipedia is based on the whole article should get deleted then if you can't note the one thing she became well known in the first place for anyway and the reason this was made. i'll ask if this can't get deleted then as you can not tell me or anyone esle that this would be up here or she would be in EVERY gossip magazine and tabloid papers if she didn't go out with him as thats NOT TRUE and you know it needs and should and has every right to be up there, shes not like Agyness Deyn or Lily Cole she didn't come well known for been and supermodel. and as for your comment:

the comment goes against WP:BLP policy because it is unsourced defamatory commentary. Do not re-add the information without a source.

i used two thats TWO sources for each one and worded it fair and very well unlike the person b4 me which is why i deleted theres i'll keep adding it as your are sounding very bias and favourising i have people i like on wikipedia but i don't change there articles to make them sound good and perfect i only add things that should be there and try and make it very neutral which is what EVERY one should do if i wanted to be bias i would be deleted anything thats not great and lovely on Keira Knightleys article or Joss Stones but i don't as some information should be on there article as long as its not written like its someone Personal opinions fan or haters. please could you learn more about wikipedia and grow up a bit it will really help you in life82.22.206.205 (talk) 18:33, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have yet to use a source which claims, "Daisy Lowe became famous because of her relationship with Mark Ronson". Until you find a source that asserts this claim, I shall have to continue to delete it, owing to the fact that it is an unsourced defamatory statement. Seraphim♥Whipp 20:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How the hell you became an adim is behond me STOP twising people words up and stop using your own POV to make up an wikipedia article you know well thats not how its done here look at MILLIONS and MILLIONS of other wikipedia article and they are the same i see no secources what so ever that says Kate Middleton i best known for been prince williams girlfriend yet thats up there same with Rumer Willis with her famous parents no secources and AGIAN Nicole Richie no secources that proves she is best know for her role on the simple life even on Keira Knightleys it says she got her big break on bend it like beckham but no where does it say "keira became famous for her role in....." all secorces i used were fine and well reached and was well worded. the only reason you are giving this article special treatment over the others is coz Kate and nicole etc.. aren't your idols like Daisy

really this isn't the place to POV's it is a place to information on people NOT FACTS look on Barack Obamas article and it says hes the first afican-american to run for president but acutally he isn't he's mixed race but most identifie him as afican american so thats why they put it there your been sad and childish having "she is the Ex girlfriend of mark ronson and the biogical child of gavin rossdale" up the top is totally fine by wikipedia standards normally on many many MANY other articles no one would say anything bout it on article like paris or peaches but coz you are a diehard fan your letting your POV get in the way if i was doing the same i would not have deleted some information from others. Try and act like real wikipedia editors for onceVeggiegirl (talk) 21:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've made many assumptions, none of which are true. I wrote the article to fill a gap in Wikipedia, not because I am a fan. If other articles are bad, they should be looked at too but the burden of this doesn't fall on me just because I've edited this article. Please try to be less aggressive in your posts and if you could make them shorter I think the discussion would be more productive. Seraphim♥Whipp 11:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy Lowe's weight[edit]

Where did her weight info come from? There should be a source. Isablue (talk) 11:57, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy Lowe Agency[edit]

Daisy Lowe is with TESS Management. If you would be so kind to add this to her page for her as her agency. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.133.14.2 (talk) 09:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT models?[edit]

Lowe is listed in a LGBT Models category but there is nothing in her profile that indicates she is anything but straight. I don't care either way but if she is going to be labeled, there should be some mention of it within her significant relationships or personal life, ideally with a quote from an interview she has done. Otherwise, it's unverified. 69.125.134.86 (talk) 02:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. If it's not considered strong enough to go in the article, then it shouldn't be in Categories. The source of it was an interview with GQ, but it's reported here in the Daily Mail. Some kind of admiration IMO doesn't count as an orientation, so I'll delete the listing. Spicemix (talk) 16:49, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Daisy Lowe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daisy Lowe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Daisy_Lowe&oldid=1208028052"