Talk:Da Vinci (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Untitled[edit]

Shouldn't there be something 'bout the film? WiiWillieWiki 21:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

There's a pornstar called "Emily DaVinci". -87.174.74.170 13:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

named after da vinici[edit]

I don't think that Da Vinci's Inquest is named after Leonardo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.176.160.47 (talk) 03:58, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese designed tile game[edit]

Da Vinci Code, aka “Coda”, 2002 Japanese designed Tile game

For completeness I added the link above, but it was rejected because it has an external link.

I’m putting it here which is unlikely to be found, but I did my best.

JohnI (talk) 21:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages are not meant to be "complete" in the sense that they include all things in the world with that title. These pages are meant to guide readers to Wikipedia articles that have the content they're looking for. If your game isn't on Wikipedia then it shouldn't be listed here. -- Fyrael (talk) 05:42, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All you and the one who reverted my post can do is spout bureaucratic nonsense.

You could have suggested that I create a stub or write the article.

Who can take seriously an organisation that allows anyone with an IP address to edit almost any article with misinformation that requires an army of editors to correct/revert!?

This is why myself and many others couldn’t be bothered contributing to such a dysfunctional website. JohnI (talk) 20:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I often do direct editors, especially new ones, to Wikipedia:Write the article first when I revert such an entry. I have to say after my post above it would seem fairly obvious though. Your misinformation statement doesn't seem to make any sense considering reversion requires nothing more than a single button click. I'm sorry that you've mistaken the simple purpose of disambiguation pages for bureaucracy. Happy editing! -- Fyrael (talk) 03:41, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]