Talk:Cusp of Carabelli

Anatomy: Gross Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Dentistry Mid‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Dentistry. If you want to participate and/or join, please visit the project page, or ask questions on the project talk page.DentistryWikipedia:WikiProject DentistryTemplate:WikiProject Dentistrydentistry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article should be renamed "Cusp of Carabelli" as that is by far the more common term. Evidenced by Google search: 201 for "Carabelli's tubercle", 653 for "Cusp of Carabelli". W00d 05:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I live in Europe, and I have none. Others? AttishOculus 18:11, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can Cusp of carabelli be found on other molars then what the description says? I've seen an extra cusp on a second mandibular molar, facial, distal side. I was told it is not a Cusp of Carabelli, but similar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.56.225.126 (talk) 00:58, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a cusp[edit]

The definition of a cusp is that it is a pyramidal projection, that is a type of lobe. In turn, a lobe are centres of calcification. Carabelli however, is not a cusp. There is no dentin and root underneath. It is just made of enamel. This is the definition of a tubercle. It should thus be changed to the Tubercle of Carabelli 132.234.229.164 (talk) 01:46, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]