Talk:Crocs/Archives/2016
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Assessment comment
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Crocs/Archives/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| I noticed this article makes no reference to Crocs' lawsuits and design/patent ruling losses in Canada & Europe. The article mentions that Crocs was based on a Canadian company (Finproject) product - the reason they lost their patent and design claims in court was that Finproject also supplied many other sellers, including Holey Soles, with the same product prior to the acquisition by Western Brands/Crocs, and that the patents were files AFTER acquisition. The result is that the design and construction were not considered novel since they were in the market prior to the patent. There are quite a few articles in other news sources and law journals referring to these cases and the intellectual property claims - this wiki article seems a bit biased for leaving those important issues out - isn't it reasonable to think this too affected the the value of Crocs' stockprice? |
Last edited at 17:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 12:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Crocs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100523223920/http://www.salon.com/news/brand_graveyard/feature/2009/07/27/crocs/index.html to http://www.salon.com/news/brand_graveyard/feature/2009/07/27/crocs/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071103063322/http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071101/crocs_ahead_of_the_bell.html?.v=1 to http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071101/crocs_ahead_of_the_bell.html?.v=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)