This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Strictly (or even not so strictly) speaking, Tuđman was not right (as already explained in the article), even if his figures were arguably closer to the truth.
Much more importantly than #1, the purpose of the paragraph is to explain one of the reasons the relations were strained, rather than to establish who was right. "Right" or "wrong", back in the early 1990s when high-six-figure number of victims was still largely accepted, Tuđman's figures (along with some other even more problematic statements in his book) surely came across like Holocaust revisionism. That was bound to cause problems in Croatia-Israel relations.
That's all there is to it, so no need to go into right-or-wrong debate in this article. GregorB (talk) 13:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can we stop this nonsense, I've been trying to push a change for a couple of days now and my changes keep getting reverted with no explanation whatsoever, although stating that Josip Broz Tito was a Yugoslav is much closer to what he himself declared as and therefore is more accurate than the correct descriptor. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.91.11.44 (talk) 12:24, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
