Talk:Crittercam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I made a few changes and created the How It Works headline. Rmic2167 (talk) 19:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a photo of a crittercam. How do I put a caption on it? Rmic2167 (talk) 20:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Why was my photo removed? How can I find a better photo for this page? I would like people to see what it looks like on an animal!Rmic2167 (talk) 19:13, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reply - As per the notices on your talk page, the image and substantial text were removed as copyright violations. You cannot just copy images from websites without appropriate permission. -- Whpq (talk) 22:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply - Thank you I didn't know how to add that! Rmic2167 (talk) 18:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What advances have been made in the zoology field through the crittercam? I think that would help further the article. Rapetkewicz (talk) 13:24, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that would help further the article, then be WP:BOLD! Research the topic and add the material! -- Whpq (talk) 14:57, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poor information[edit]

I have read the information provided by NatGeo on their website, but found them very uninformative. One cannot read anything about weight, sizes, resolution of the cam, battery capacity etc. Mazarin07 (talk) 09:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smallest animal with a crittercam[edit]

"The smallest animal yet to carry Crittercam is the Emperor Penguin" - what about Kitty Cam? Isn't it considered as "yet-another-crittercam"? Isn't a cat the smallest animal to carry crittercam? Or the name Crittercam is like a trade mark and refers only to the researches, made by National Geographic etc?.. --Piramidion (talk) 13:12, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And in pigeon photography - pigeon harness and camera are generally also a crittercam-like appliance. Or crittercam should also gather some other information like temperature or speed to be really considered a crittercam? I just don't get it...--Piramidion (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:18, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

The article contains a list of references which cannot even be checked if one doesn't have his login and password for the website they lead to. I guess, that's not OK, and something should be done about it...--Piramidion (talk) 13:24, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Crittercam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]