Talk:Crested shelduck

Crested shelduck has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 30, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 31, 2007.

Birds Low‑importance

Crested shelduck is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Righty-ho, let's tear into this one.....

Very little is known about this bird, which apparently bred in Korea and eastern Russia and was probably a relict species that had a wider distribution in prehistoric times. - I'd probably split this sentence. the 'and' seems to be a bit of a tenuous link and sounds a bit odd when one says it out load.

I split the sentence. Is this better?

However, it is generally believed that this species is not a hybrid and that the existence of such a hybrid would be unlikely - I am wracking my brains - is there a way to not use two 'hybrid's in the one sentence? Might be tricky and if unavoidable then that is that but...

How do you like "crossbreed" for the second hybrid? If not, then I don't know.

The Crested Shelduck was initially described in 1890.. - I'd use the verb 'reported' so as to distinguish from 'Described' (i.e. formally) 2 sentences later.

Done

The genus name Tadorna comes from Celtic roots -be good to link Celtic and find the word it may be from if possible. Not a deal-breaker for GA but one less hurdle for FAC

Done

it is believed to be a migratory species --> 'it is believed to be migratory' (reduce reduplication)

Done

It eats vegetation, agricultural crops,.. - any more info here? Both could mean a wide variety of things...

I don't think anyone has studied its dietary habits- I got the impression most of this is conjecture based on its relatives. I clarified a bit more- does it need more?

Lots of sentences beginning with 'It' in Ecology and behavior section

better?

The Crested Shelduck never had a large population in modern times,... - sounds odd, '..was never numerous ?

much better phrasing

..there likely are less than 50 individuals. - fewer

Done

over collecting - one word?

Done

Otherwise - looking good. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:25, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing it, Casliber. I put my comments above below each point. If there are other things, I'll adress them as soon as I can. Thanks. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 05:09, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, all good. OK we're there. congrats. question is - is there enough other material for FAC...I guess there could be more in taxonomy re tadorna and relationships with other shelducks, and some more about extinction, reckon it's worth a shot? cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It never crossed my mind to submit it at a FAC because of it shortness. IMO its complete unless taxonomy gets expanded and I think it meets the MOS. However, it is also only 12000 bytes (14000 tops w. taxo expansion). Probably will let it sit for a while if I do anything- planning on fufilling some promises and bring Andean Condor to FA and will fiddle with Huia (in great shape before I found it), Ivory-billed Woodpecker, John James Audubon, Mark Catesby, Chinese Crested Tern, Gurney's Pitta, Richard Dobbs Spaight... (dwindles off) Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 06:47, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah no worries. I've come to appreciate GA more now as a way-station. It can be left and has a handy reference point for later. You never know, some more stuff may come up :) cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at this: I can get this to FA, I expect. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 20:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Crested shelduck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:17, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]