Talk:Creekmoor Light Railway

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

More information:
/
	This article lacks references.
	It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Dorset Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tidying[edit]

I'm tidying up this article. It's more of a story than an article and I think it should be slimmed down. Could I please have suggestions on which bits should be removed. Biscuittin (talk) 19:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have boldly edited the article removing much of the personal anecdote (which would make a good read elsewhere but not in a Wikipedia article) and wikifying where possible. I was unable to find references to support the article so it may still fail on notability and verifiability. The reference for the brick company is dated 1977 so does not match the dates in the article - possibly refs wrong company/site. Lame Name (talk) 14:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot understand the second paragraph under "Operation". Without some form of track layout plan, it is meaningless. Jamjarface (talk) 19:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]