Talk:Counter-electronics High Power Microwave Advanced Missile Project

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

About the Orphan thing[edit]

I linked Electromagnetic Pulse to this page. The link is under non-nuclear weapons. I believe that means that this page is no longer an orphan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belac Athanasius (talk • contribs) 03:09, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Counter-electronics High Power Microwave Advanced Missile Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100321164415/http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog to http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&plckPostId=Blog%3A27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3A347da0db-c427-4928-85ff-da01662523fe

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request[edit]

(moved from above)

The following quote is incorrect: "The CHAMP is superior to other electronic warfare weapons because it destroys electronics…", the reason being that the device doesn't exist yet. It's a concept. Therefore a more accurate, less marketing driven statement would be, "The CHAMP program intends to produce a weapon that is superior to current electronic warfare weapons, because it destroys electronics…". A proper edit cannot be made however, because the edit link for this particular section is not present. Both mistakes should be rectified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.13.17.37 (talk) 23:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While still(?) experimental, the device exists, and has been tested, as described in the second paragraph. As for the section edit button, for some reason the default is to not have an edit button on the lead section, although one can be enabled in preferences/gadgets/appearance, but I think that requires an account. But the whole-article edit button should still be available at the top, and I see no protection on the page that would prevent you from making an edit. Rwessel (talk) 11:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]