Talk:Cosmo (restaurant)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2013. The result of the discussion was snow keep.

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... it is a well known restaurant chain and are regularly filled to capacity with up to an hour wait at the weekend. The chain has 12 restaurants and will add 4 more in 2013, the chain serves over 25,000 people every week and is really well known in the cities it has restaurants. I see the companies presence on Wikipedia is as relevant as Frankie & Benny's and although I must admit it could use alot more information I think if it was deleted from Wikipedia it would be a big mistake. --Fhs man 2 (talk) 03:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have reliable sources written about Cosmo? If they have, please add that information to the article to prevent its deletion. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:20, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... this page has already been nominated for speedy deletion in the past and has been overruled and has been seen as relevant. --Fhs man 2 (talk) 11:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In that case I suggest that you add some reliable third party sources and make the article more encyclopaedic. Regarding the deletion nominations only one person defended the article. I'm sure it can be improved to better reflect real notability rather than sounding like a corporate promotional page. Good luck. ww2censor (talk) 19:50, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article did have reliable sources when I looked at it, I've suggested some more to look at it on the AfD, and another editor has added a few. Nobody has endorsed deletion on the relevant AfD either - if it was a genuine A7 it might be closed as "snow delete" by now. With respect, you're just biting a bit too much here - if you suggest to a newbie to add reliable sources when they're already there, they're going to get seriously confused. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:22, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are probably right that I was too snappy on this one though it needs improvement to sound less corporate and more encyclopaedic. ww2censor (talk) 22:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - there are certainly too many references to primary sources still sitting in the article. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cosmo (restaurant). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:02, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]