Talk:Coronary arteries

Anatomy: Gross Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 July 2019 and 30 August 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jamesdejesus4, Eryn808, TotoroMD, UHmed23, Corisutt.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

This disambig page is pointless. Functionally, there is no difference between the right and left coronary arteries. What users really want is coronary circulation. For strictly anatomic information you can click on the the left or right link present in this disambig page. I will change this (and repair the redirects) unless I receive objection on this page. Dlodge 15:12, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. A redirect to coronary circulation would be better. CheekyMonkey 15:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Searched all the pages linking to here and ensured no double redirects. Dlodge 18:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Write full article?[edit]

Would someone like to write a full broad concept article on this? It's been brought to my attention (by User: BD2412 that disambiguating Coronary arteries appears to create a WP:DABCONCEPT violation, and suggested restoring the previous redirect to Coronary circulation. What do you guys think? I think keeping it as an invitation for someone knowledgeable to write a full article about it. In the mean time, I have removed the "coronary arteries" link and bolded it instead on coronary circulation. Mistakefinder (talk) 02:29, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything that would go in an article on coronary arteries that would not be redundant to coronary circulation? bd2412 T 03:32, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since there has been no further discussion of this point, I have gone ahead with the redirect. The coronary arteries are already covered in coronary circulation. This accords with the 2006 decision reached above, from which I see no consensus to deviate. bd2412 T 20:25, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to project page as own page needed --Iztwoz (talk) 09:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]