Talk:Constitutional Court of Kosovo

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Kosovo

	Constitutional Court of Kosovo is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Article nomination for deletion[edit]

Since when the state constitutions are the intellectual property of various web pages. All laws are issued in the public domain.

that web site cites this law: http://www.gjk-ks.org/repository/docs/Law_03-L-121_CCK.pdf which is the document issued by the Assembly

The website quoted the Kosovo constitution, laws can be found in millions of different web pages as they are not copyrighted .

I will work in improving the article because that just as I started.-- LONTECH Talk 17:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As Lontech stated, all laws are released in the public domain, so there is no copyright infringement. Also the article is a stub and will hopefully mature in the near future. Cheers. kedadial 19:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wikipedia is no place to cite the laws. Only text here can be found also at [1] and there, it is ©. Copyright infringement. --Tadija^taking 20:34, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Tadija. kedadial 22:19, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually that's the definition of what the Constitutional Court is[2].--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 21:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

continued presence of international judges[edit]

The continued presence of 3 internationally apoointed judges is debatable, see [3] and [4] and [5] (2014).----Bancki (talk) 20:03, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The court ruled in favor of the constitutionality of the continued presence of its three international judges (judgement of 13.11.2014 nr. KO 155-14), but afterwards, the president of the court (then Enver Hasani) was accused of falsifying the signature of Robert F. Carolan (the U.S. judge of the court), see [6] and [7].----Bancki (talk) 12:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Visoki Dečani monastery case 20.05.2016 notable enough to be mentioned?[edit]

Is the Visoki Dečani monastery land case (decision nr. KI-132/15 of 20.05.2016) notable enough to be mentioned? (It aroused some protest, see [8] and [9])----Bancki (talk) 11:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Carolan still Judge?[edit]

Why has the website of the Constitutional Court of Kosovo itself [[10] listed Robert F. Carolan with the former judges of the court?----Bancki (talk) 11:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]