Talk:Constitution Act 1902

Australia: New South Wales / Law Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Constitution Act 1902 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change the name[edit]

The article name should be change to Constitution of New South Wales, Constitution Act 1902 doesn't make sense unless you read the article

Citing References[edit]

Given the article is a piece of Australian Legislation, is AGLC4 the most appropriate method of referencing sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Studentofacademia (talk • contribs) 06:36, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Studentofacademia: welcome to wikipedia. The answer is sort of - inspired by is probably closer. If you look at the Manual of Style/Legal in the section Australia it expressly refers to Australian Guide to Legal Citation. Being an online encyclopedia though means aspects, such as repeated footnotes, have little relevance & so you are trying to meld the wikipedia style with the guide. The easiest way to cite Australian legislation is using AustLII & the template:cite Legislation AU & for cases template:cite AustLII. An example of using cite AustLII is {{cite AustLII|HCA|3|1931|litigants=Attorney-General (NSW) v Trethowan |link=Attorney-General (New South Wales) v Trethowan |parallelcite=[http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1931/3.pdf (1931) 44 CLR 394] |courtname=[[High Court of Australia|High Court]]}} which shows as Attorney-General (New South Wales) v Trethowan [1931] HCA 3, (1931) 44 CLR 394, High Court. The only reference in this article uses a different form, but as its a stub, that can change and anyone who has the time to expand it should use a consistent form. Let me know if you have a specific question. --Find bruce (talk) 10:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]