Talk:Connie Smith/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mr. R00t ^Talk 00:19, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: The prose is a tad bit long. Otherwise good.

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: - Sorry for the delay.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Very good.

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: In the musical career section there really need to be more images. Only three images in the article.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: Found another image on Flickr. Mr. R00t ^Talk 00:51, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: images, if three's all we have then that's all we can use, because they do have to be free ones. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:47, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do know that. I'm going to look around for free images of her. Mr. R00t ^Talk 17:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added this to the GA list. I've added the template. It is now a Good Article. Mr. R00t ^Talk 01:04, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]