Talk:Common hawk-cuckoo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Classification[edit]

Rasmussen and Anderton 2005 treat Hierococcyx as a distinct genus and does not treat this species as a Cuculus. This needs to be verified from more recent molecular work and corrections need to be incorporated in this and the Cuckoo article which does not list this species. Shyamal


The photographs are a total mess. The brain fever-bird is sexually dimorphic. The male is pitch black. The female is a spotted brown. The photos displayed belong to some other species. Allow me to send your a correct picture.

chanrajesq@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.43.212.51 (talk) 15:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Common hawk-cuckoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]