Talk:Comics in education

Comics Mid‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

notes and references[edit]

How is it that sources that directly cited in the text are "notes" and books that are relevant but not used are "references" ? Is it an American thing? --Cameron Scott (talk) 10:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well it is the difference between footnotes and general references (WP:CITE, and the previous version of WP:LAYOUT, seem to prefer "Notes" over "Footnote") - without it the single sections gets messy and unclear where one starts and the other begins (especially handy for footnoting references to books where the full details are in the references.

My concern is there seem a lot of books in the reference section and some of them strike me as being better in a separate "Further reading" section but, as I've not contributed any information to this article I can't specifically say what was used as a general reference or what would count. We'd be better off if most of those books were used to add specific information to the article and footnoted appropriately (as opposed to being general references) with the rest shifted off to further reading. I'll leave that call to the active editors. (Emperor (talk) 17:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Spidey Super Stories[edit]

Should there be mention of the Spidey Super Stories series? That comic book series was specifically made for teachers to give the students to read in the classroom. I even remember reading a coupon in one of them saying that teachers were encouraged to order many copies, and that a discount would be offered! CarpetCrawler (talk) 21:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, great idea!, that should be in here as an example - we could do with some material explaining what the aim of those comics was. --Cameron Scott (talk) 21:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OSU[edit]

The Ohio State University now boasts a huge comics library, and is offering more and more comic books classes. A professor there has stated that he sees a not-too-distant future in which OSU has a Comics Studies program. http://cartoons.osu.edu/?q=home —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.49.19.90 (talk) 03:26, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Comics in education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]