Talk:Colour Cross

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Colours vs Colors[edit]

After seeing the release dates for the game, I take back my move statement. Does the article stay at "Colours", since it came out there first? Blake (Talk·Edits) 20:48, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it should be at Colour. Not only because the game came out in Europe first, but also because the Wikipedia page was started with that name first. I'll move it back. Tim (Xevious) (talk) 15:54, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter what name it "started at first". But being released in Europe first does make it have to have the European name. I am not sure why I didn't move it back immediately afterwards. Blake (Talk·Edits) 16:32, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
MOS:RETAIN would say otherwise! Tim (Xevious) (talk) 10:10, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That just means that if an article is of a sufficient size, and has a lot of history, it wouldn't be worth changing the spelling differences of things at that point. Since this is still a stub, it could go either way, and you must go on other guidelines.
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (video games) states "Use the most commonly accepted English name first, if one exists. This is usually the official title in the initial English release, but not always. Subtitles and pre-titles are allowed if deemed appropriate but are not necessary and pre-titles should be replaced once an official title has been announced" Since its initial release was in Europe, that is its name for the article, unless the NA version was significantly more popular, or got more attention. Blake (Talk·Edits) 13:30, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colour Cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]