Talk:Colossal magnetoresistance
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Untitled[edit]
The theory about why this works may be understood at the current point in time (Due to what is written on the Oak Ridge web site), and needs an expert to review.
I don't think it's understood yet. One of my team members works directly with the theory group at ORNL. They have some theories, and have been testing them and publishing papers, but colossal magnetoresistance still isn't a completely understood phenomenon. SeanAhern 01:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
The main features of CMR are understood within the double exchange mechanism, plus the phase separation phenomenon. The latter is not completely understood yet, at least in a quantitative way. But it's quite incorrect to say that "no physical theories" explain this phenomenon. --130.251.188.1 13:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Colossal magnetoresistance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041213043205/http://physicsweb.org:80/articles/world/12/2/12 to http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/12/2/12
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Assessment comment[edit]
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Colossal magnetoresistance/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Although I cannot add any correction to this article, I can asure you that there is in fact at least one theory wich explains this effect.
I strongly suggest that you look for the credible guidance on this subject so that you can improve the quality of the information provided. The only - yet very serious - problem about the internet as source of information is that the huge quantity of information is rarely believable. I truly wish that Wikipedia suceeds as a credible source of knowledge and remain as the main reference of Web Encyclopedias. Greatings, Ivo Leite (physics' student) |
Last edited at 11:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 12:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)