Talk:College of Information and Cyberspace

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Military history: Technology / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Wikipedia is international[edit]

When creating/editing content, please keep in mind that Wikipedia has an international audience. For example, this article started with:

The Information Resources Management (IRM) College is a group of educators working to inform the nation's leaders, from the government as well as private sector.

I am going to change this to make clear that the "nation" and "government" refers to the United States. CosineKitty (talk) 13:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheerleading and advertising phraseology[edit]

The opening paragraph has some problems with sounding like advertising. I tagged two of the more glaring problems with the ^[who?] tag. If multiple independent sources can attest to IRM in such glowing terms, they should be cited in a verifiable way. Also, perhaps I have read too many Dilbert cartoons, but I involuntarily roll my eyes when I see a Pointy-Haired Boss phrase like provides strategic direction and vision. This is my own personal bias, but I suspect I speak for many others in reacting negatively to such wording. Overall I find it hard to take the article seriously when it has the tone of marketing literature. CosineKitty (talk) 13:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Information Resources Management College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080704010524/http://www.ndu.edu/info/history.cfm to http://www.ndu.edu/info/history.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:00, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]