Talk:Colby, Wisconsin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge proposal[edit]

The Colby (town), Wisconsin article has virtually no content, and neither article explains the difference between the two municipalities. Am I right in thinking that Colby (town) just covers the part of Colby (city) that's within Clark County? If so, then I don't think it needs a seperate article. In any case, I don't think there's enough material about Colby (in general) to justify two articles, and I don't see any reason why any information about Colby (town) in particular can't go in this article. Tevildo 10:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The city of Colby and town of Colby are two distinct municipalities with separate populations and governments, so the articles should remain separate. (Clark County doesn't have a great map selection online, but you can see the difference here. The town is lowercase and the city capitalized. [1]) Although "town" in most states just means a smaller city, a town in Wisconsin is a different entity that rural areas are divided into; a good explanation is at political subdivisions of Wisconsin. So, if we got rid of the town of Colby article, it would follow that the other 1,260 towns' articles would have to be deleted as well. I hope that was a helpful explanation. Dmp348 22:00, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Colby, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]