Talk:Citroën C3

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Second generation section rewording.[edit]

The section about the second generation desperately needs a rewrite. It sounds like someone got the information from a Citroën brochure or something. Chevymontecarlo. 18:50, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The first generation: "Many components of the C3 are the same as those of the Peugeot 206, for example the external mirrors." The external mirrors are 100% different, 206 mirrors or even 207 will not fit a C3, i can guarantee it as i'm in the car trade and no-one will tell you they are the same. Jenova20 (talk) 17:23, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Separate article for Citroën C3 Picasso[edit]

The only similarities are the name, the vehicle is completely unrelated to the C3 and so i request a move to Citroën C3 Picasso.Thanks Jenova20 17:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, to make clear i'm requesting a move only for the C3 Picasso section and not the entire article Jenova20 17:27, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support: same name but different car. OSX (talk • contributions) 08:37, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly Support: Completely different car and different name. There was no reason to group them together in the first place. Jenova20 16:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support: probably they share same platform, but anyway its so different that it could have own article -->Typ932 ^T·C 17:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support - as per previous commentators. ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ (talk) 08:03, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's not going to be a reasonable argument that links these two cars together so anyone want to close this and move them?

Thanks Jenova20 09:38, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there might still be someone out there with a difffering opinion, but I say go ahead right noo. ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ (talk) 10:04, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There probably is, but they won't be able to prove these cars are connected enough to get the same article.

I have 99% confidence in that judgement Jenova20 10:35, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've split this off since there was no argument against a split. Can anyone with a knowledge of creating articles check in though. Thanks Jenova20 11:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

South American C3[edit]

The second generation C3 has been recently released in Brazil. It has a few differences with the European version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.108.89.82 (talk) 03:08, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Variants: Airdream+ and Auto[edit]

So I created a table out of a list, but some items also had 'Airdream+' or 'Auto' added near the end of the list. 'Auto' may mean type of transmission, but I don't understand how or where to categorize the 'Airdream+' moniker. I know it's probably a marketing term on Citroën's part, but confusing when some engine trim levels are called "Airdream", while some other non-Airdream+ trim levels can have what appears to be the Airdream+ pack. So someone in the know should clear up the confusion. -Mardus (talk) 17:42, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fastest product sold in the world???[edit]

"The C3 is the fastest product sold in the world"

What does this even mean?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.76.131 (talk) 14:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Citroën C3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090704215947/http://www.citroen.co.uk/new-cars/citroen-c3/ to http://citroen.co.uk/new-cars/citroen-c3/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spare tyre[edit]

Diea it have a spare tyre 86.4.201.129 (talk) 16:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]