This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This should be merged to Kibaku language, as the first written dictionary of the language uses the term "Kibaku (Chibok)" --Djembayz (talk) 13:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. Wikipedia uses common English usage. Both Ethnologue (following ISO 639-3) and Glottolog use Cibak as does the great majority of literature on Afroasiatic languages. --Taivo (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmn, if that's what you're spotting in the general literature, then let's go with that instead. Shall we merge to Cibak for now? --Djembayz (talk) 13:25, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. (I don't know how to merge other than cut and paste). About half of the Kibaku article is irrelevant for linguistics, however. --Taivo (talk) 13:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
