Talk:Chris Bullivant
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Balanced content and notability[edit]
I've gone back to the version last edited by User:Eric Corbett, because
- claims are supported by the sources. e.g. first free daily, not first free paper
- language is more balanced and has less hyperbole ("tycoon" etc)
- content is more balanced and includes discussion of the Birmingham Press, otherwise article is reporting beneficial claims and not reporting adverse ones, read like a promo
- is slightly more convincing of notability. The article survived WP:PROD with an impressive claim of "first free paper" (which seems unsound) and without that the Birmingham Press story is the most compelling content left.
- removed full DOB, I think based on WP:DOB we should maybe have the year if we can source it
It's still not a great article but has clearly improved (thanks User:Eric Corbett!). It does seem to suffer from promotional content (re)appearing, I suppose this is pretty normal in the media business, but it needs to be NPOV and we shouldn't need to have anything in there which looks overly COI to make it notable. Behind The Wall Of Sleep (talk) 11:34, 22 February 2014 (UTC)