Talk:Choice overload
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | The contents of the Choice overload page were merged into Overchoice and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
I rewrote this to reflect what I have read about the subject. It seemed like the previous version was stating the exact opposite of what I thought it meant. I am by no means an expert and would prefer is someone else came along and expanded upon this article. Kingmundi 17:38, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
merge[edit]
I suggest merging the article overchoice into the article choice overload. As far as I can tell, both names are synonyms for the same phenomena, or at least similar enough that one article could cover both of them with a sentence or two clarifying the difference. --68.0.124.33 (talk) 20:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Reverse Merge[edit]
I suggest merging the content of Choice Overload with that of Overchoice. I feel that the term "overchoice" more effectively conveys the social psychological theory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.75.148.99 (talk) 21:00, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with the reverse merge, particularly as choice overload is unreferenced, and overload is well referenced. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 04:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)