Talk:Chitinase

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Amazing Discoveries[edit]

The items conatained about this subject is highly recommended to teach in our public and private schools for informational purposes only. T. Riley EHS. 3/4/2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by EHS4950 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speculative ref[edit]

@Boghog: deleted a reference and inserted the following speculative references instead:

Rosenberg MJ, Feldblum PJ, Marshall EG (Jul 1987). "Occupational influences on reproduction: a review of recent literature". Journal of Occupational Medicine. 29 (7): 584–91. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.106559. PMID 3612335.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)

If it is to be included in the article an url is needed at the minimum. Is this some sophisticated vandalism? RhinoMind (talk) 11:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. The problem was before my edit, the PMC id was miss-assigned as the PMID. The script I was using to standardize the citations assumes that the value of the PMID is correct. I have included the correct PMID in this edit. Also please note that if |pmc= is assigned, it automatically links the article title to PMC, so that the |url= becomes redundant. Boghog (talk) 13:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that should explain a few things. But it is a completely different article, with another title? And it might even be relevant, eventhough it is from the 1980s. I haven't read it though and are not aware if it holds any useful information to add. RhinoMind (talk) 13:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the two articles are completely unrelated and as far as I can tell, PMID 3612335 has zero relevance to the subject of chitinase. My original edit was in error. Again, sorry about that. Boghog (talk) 14:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]