Talk:Chinese espionage in the United States/Archives/2013
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Intelligence operations or espionage
This article is titled intelligence operations, but it focuses on espionage. Intelligence operations are generally legal, whereas espionage is by definition illegal. As shown by details of the legal cases, most of these so called Chinese spies are not spies but have been stitched up. 86.136.200.49 (talk) 00:53, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Bias
There seems to be an unfair slant that draws definite conclusions in particular unsolved cyber espionage cases. The slant here seems to be concluding that the Chinese government is involved in several cyber attacks that cannot or have not yet been attributed to any person or organization. 173.181.19.68 (talk) 21:13, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Staan173.181.19.68 (talk) 21:13, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with you. I have put the NOV template into the article. I will spend some time later to balance the article more. --Leo (talk) 06:59, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- Given the revelations by Edward Snowden, a section on USA espionage against China should be included to counter-balance claims of bias. 86.136.200.49 (talk) 01:34, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
- Everyone spies on one another. There is enough blame to go around. A section in this article about US espionage elsewhere should have its own page. What is important here is the power by a communist nation (same as any other primitive dictatorship) over its people. It's hard to get back-up on that stuff unless you spend the time to go through reams of data released via Wikileaks and then you'll still get deletionists arguing that the data is not reliable etc. I have been reverted enough by people who would not even trouble themselves to actually read the cited information and pretend that it's all irrelevant nonsense or pretend that it neither existed nor was mentioned. From public domain information about the realm, there is nothing particularly surprising in this article. Instead of tagging, I suggest to fix it. What would be really hilarious is if the Chinese gathered all sorts of info and then the CIA went in and deleted it off their servers or corrupted it to the point where the readers would spin their wheels. If that went on, I suppose we'd never hear about it, but it would sure be a humorous angle. --Achim (talk) 00:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
CIA and Mossad?
So, wheres the detailed articles on "CIA operations in the PRC", or "Mossad intelligence operations in the USA". get busy wiki ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gizziiusa (talk • contribs) 14:41, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- People usually create articles if they're interested in the topics. If you want articles on these topics, and they don't exist yet, then go ahead and create them. The wiki is created by IPs like you, not by any group of people. - M0rphzone (talk) 10:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Shouldn't we just have a top-four page?
http://www.economist.com/news/international/21580485-edward-snowdens-revelations-about-american-espionage-have-riled-europeans-so-has America publicly ranks France along with Israel and Russia as a cyber-espionage menace. Only China is worse.