Talk:Chenopodium album

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The images was incorrect, I removed it. May 3,2007 Warren Lee

"Fat hen" is a regional name. Any objections to moving this page to Chenopodium album? --SB_Johnny | talk 11:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done - MPF 12:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Chenopodiaceae - Amaranthaceae[edit]

In the APG II system, of 2003 (unchanged from the APG system, of 1998), the family Amaranthaceae is placed in the order Caryophyllales. It includes the plants formerly treated as the family Chenopodiaceae. The name for the former family Chenopodiaceae has become a nom. cons. JoJan 08:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saponins and the use as food[edit]

I think there should be some information in the article regarding saponins. With quinoa (a relative of this plant), the seeds must be washed before use to remove the saponins. Saponins are also used as soap. According to http://www.ibiblio.org/pfaf/cgi-bin/arr_html?Chenopodium+album native Americans used saponins (likely from this plant) to stun fish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.2.73.157 (talk) 07:25, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use as walking stick?[edit]

This reference is highly dubious, as Chenopodium album is an herbaceous annual species. There is absolutely no woody material whatsoever left behind by its growth cycle to be used as a walking stick. 67.142.172.27 (talk) 03:03, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to find a good reference for this but couldn't so I removed it.Glorioussandwich (talk) 05:57, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That reference is fine. It indicates quite clearly that this plant was used as a walking stick in the past, which is all we need. The character 藜 is undeniably chenopodium album[1] [2] 74.102.173.9 (talk) 22:48, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chenopodium album. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chenopodium album. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Blindlynx: What is WP:UNDUE about this? — Invasive Spices (talk) 18:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chenopodium (album var.) missouriense[edit]

I created redirects to this article from Chenopodium missouriense, Chenopodium album missouriense, and Chenopodium album var. missouriense. C. missouriense has been demoted to subspecies status and is now considered to be a synonym of Chenopodium album var. missouriense. References: POWO; Alabama Plant Atlas; FSUS.

I see that C. album var. missouriense is not mentioned in this article. It may be worth giving it a passing mention or a section of its own. The taxonomy section might do well to have an update and to include info on the differences between the various accepted infraspecies, such as physical characteristics and geographical differences. I don't really have the time or energy to do that right now, but I thought it might be worth mentioning on the talk page. Delvethedragon (talk) 00:59, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Delvethedragon: Hi! Thanks for the redirects. I just reviewed and approved them. I totally get not having the energy to add information to the quality/depth you want, I do that all the time. In the future it'd be really helpful to have some brief mention of the redirect term on the target page just to speed up review time though so reviewers don't have to look it up. WP:RPLA covers something similar, but I don't think bolding every redirect mention is necessary personally. Anyway! Thanks for the work! :) originalmesstalk 06:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciate it. I will try to keep this in mind when creating redirects in the future. Delvethedragon (talk) 09:51, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]