Talk:Cheddar (TV channel)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sagecandor (talk · contribs) 19:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
I'll look this one over and write up a review. Sagecandor (talk) 19:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination[edit]
This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 13, 2017, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Not quite GA yet. I see it's currently rated "stub class", and it's still there. Lede fails WP:LEAD, doesn't function as a standalone summary of the entire article's contents. History could be broken up into a couple of subsections for better organization and readability. Overview should come before history. Programs should have more info on each program. A few sentences. And a couple of sources of reception.
- 2. Verifiable?: No issues here.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Not quite GA here due to issues above, no info on Reception to speak of. How to critics like their offerings? Does the channel get good ratings? Who are its main competitors? They're raising a lot of financing and taking on a lot of debt, are they profitable yet?
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Can't assess due to insufficient sources about Reception, Analysis, Impact, Commentary, etc.
- 5. Stable?: Article appears stable.
- 6. Images?: File:Cheddar owler.png appears to be copyvio.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Sagecandor (talk) 00:33, 13 June 2017 (UTC)