Talk:Charodeika-class monitor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Charodeika-class monitor/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 12:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article shortly.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • No disambiguation links found (no action required)
  • Checklinks reports no problems with external links (no action required)
  • There are four duplicate links in the article which should be removed per WP:OVERLINK. Those are: boiler, smoothbore, waterline and freeboard.
  • Image sourcing/licence/caption seem to be in order. The presently found templates at the commons indicate US-PD tag is required. Maybe it would be a good idea to add one.
  • Prose referencing appears to be in order (no action required)
  • Please add ISSN (or OCLC) for Warship International. According to this, ISSN is 0043-0374.
  • Where does the 762,000 rouble pricetag specified in the infobox come from? I found no mention of the cost in the prose.
  • Prose indicates 13+171=184 officers and crew in design/description, 177 in sinking of Rusalka, while the infobox states 172. Should there be some modifications to the infobox or it pertains to a specific period/configuration?
    • Crew size always fluctuates as equipment is added or removed; I'm just using what my main source gave me for crew numbers.
      • Of course, but the figure stated in the infobox does not appear in the prose where it could be referenced - at least I can't find it there.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for taking this long to review the article - a RL project quickly piled. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:24, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No trouble, thanks for reviewing it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All clear now. Good work!--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]